Home

EncycloZine

An Encyclopedia for Curious Minds

Topics

  • Arts
    • Architecture
    • Artists
    • Dance
    • Fashion
    • Literature
    • Movies
    • Music
    • Photography
    • Theatre
    • Visual Art
  • History
    • About_History
    • Archaeology
    • Biography
    • Historical Civilizations
    • Historical Wars
    • History Events
    • History Ideas
    • World_History
  • Life & Nature
    • Animals
    • Biology
    • Ecology
    • Health
  • Recreation
    • Games
    • Indoor Recreation
    • Optical Illusions
    • Outdoor Recreation
    • Puzzles
    • Quizzes
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Travel
  • Science
    • Astronomy
    • Branches of Science
    • Chemistry
    • Earth
    • History of Science
    • Mathematics
    • Philosophy of Science
    • Physics
    • Scientific Method
  • Society
    • Business
    • Economics
    • Education
    • Geography
    • Language
    • Philosophy
  • Space & Astronomy
    • Astronaut
    • Hubble Space Telescope
    • NASA
    • Space Exploration
    • Space Shuttle
  • Technology
    • Transport
    • Agriculture
    • Computer
    • Engineering
    • Radio
    • Television

Active forum topics

  • What shall we talk about today?
more

Navigation

  • Forums
  • Polls

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Syndicate

Syndicate content
more

Advertising

  • The most elegant and simple way to observe the action of gravity is to show
  • how it defines the movements of objects in space. In fact, it was studies of the orbits of the planets that led Isaac Newton to devise his formula for gravity in the first place. This chapter gives a short introduction to "orbital mechanics".


    [3.1] ELEMENTARY ORBITAL MECHANICS
    [3.2] SATELLITE ORBITS
    [3.3] INTERPLANETARY SPACECRAFT TRANSFER ORBITS
    [3.4] GRAVITY ASSIST TRAJECTORIES
    [3.5] GRAVITY AND PLANETS / TIDES
    [3.6] GRAVITY IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM / LIBRATION POINTS / STELLAR MASSES
    [3.7] LIBRATION POINTS, HALO ORBITS, & MANIFOLDS
    [3.8] FOOTNOTE: LARRY NIVEN'S INTEGRAL TREES

    [3.1] ELEMENTARY ORBITAL MECHANICS

  • As established in chapter 1, gravity is the only one of the four forces
  • that operates over long distances. It is an attraction between two masses and its magnitude is given by:
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
        gravitational_force  =  constant * mass1 * mass2 / distance^2
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
    -- where the distance is between the center of mass of the two objects, and:
        constant  =  6.672E-11
     
    -- in standard metric units. The precise value of this very small constant has been determined by painfully exact experiments, in which a pair of masses are balanced in a vacuum on a bar supported by a wire thread, and allowed to pivot towards larger fixed masses.

    The force of gravity continues to grow weaker as the distance from Earth increases, but it never stops completely. Earth, or any other celestial body in the Universe, is said to be at the bottom of a "gravity well".

  • The workings of gravity can clearly considered by visualizing the motion of
  • an artificial satellite in orbit around the Earth. The orbit of such a satellite is defined by the balance of the satellite's orbital velocity against the force of the Earth's gravitational attraction. This force is given by:
        gravitational_force  =  constant * mass_earth * mass_satellite / distance^2
     
    The mass of the satellite is irrelevant. Double the mass of the satellite and the force of the Earth's attraction on it is doubled, but the amount of force required to get the increased mass to accelerate to a given velocity is doubled as well. In this case, it is simpler to work with the acceleration of the satellite caused by the Earth's attraction rather than the force itself.

    Since force is equal to mass times acceleration, then:

        gravitational_acceleration  =  constant * mass_earth / distance^2
     
    The acceleration of gravity at the surface of the Earth is 9.81 meters per second squared, and so this formula can be simplified further, to:
        gravitational_acceleration  = 9.80665 / ( orbital_radius / earth_radius )^2
     
    The orbital radius is measured in meters from the center, not the surface, of the Earth. The radius of the Earth is 6,340,000 meters (6,340 kilometers). This means that the gravitational acceleration of a satellite in an orbit 1,000 kilometers above the surface of the Earth would be:
        9.81 / ( ( 6,378,000 + 1,000,000 ) / 6,378,000 )^2  
        
         = 7.33 meters per second squared
     
    In a stable circular orbit, this force is balanced by the centripedal acceleration of the satellite due to its orbital velocity, which is given by:
        centripedal_acceleration  =  orbital_radius * angular_velocity^2
     
    Balancing the two expressions gives:
        9.81 / ( orbital_radius / earth_radius )^2 
        
         = orbital_radius * angular_velocity^2
     
    -- or:
                                                                  1
         orbital_radius^3  = ( 9.81 * earth_radius^2 ) * --------------------
                                                          angular_velocity^2
     
    This equation is a little easier to handle if angular velocity is converted into "orbital period", or the amount of time it takes for a satellite to make one orbit of the Earth, in hours.

    Radians per second can be converted to revolutions per second by dividing by 2PI, and then revolutions per second can be converted to revolutions per hour by multiplying by 60 * 60 = 3,600. Orbital period is the inverse of revolutions per hour, and so the conversion is:

                                       2PI
         angular_velocity  =  ------------------------
                               3,600 * orbital_period
     
     
    Plugging this into the equation gives:
        orbital_radius^3  
     
                                                         1
          = ( 9.81 * earth_radius^2 ) * ------------------------------------
                                         ( 2PI / 3,600 * orbital_period )^2
     
     
             3,600^2 * 9.81 * earth_radius^2
          = --------------------------------- * orbital_period^2
                          2PI^2
     
    Giving the orbital radius in meters is also inconvenient, but that can be adjusted to give it in kilometers by dividing through by 1,000^3:
     
                              3,600^2 * 9.81 * earth_radius^2
        orbital_radius^3  =  --------------------------------- * orbital_period^2
                                     1,000^3 * 2PI^2
     
     
    This leads to a very simple relationship:
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
        orbital_radius^3  =  constant * orbital_period^2
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
     
    This is known in general as "Kepler's Third Law". Kepler's three laws are a description of planetary orbits devised by the 16th-century German astronomer Johannes Kepler (1571:1630) from observations of the orbits of the planets. They strongly influenced the development of Newton's law of universal gravitation. The other two laws are discussed in later sections of this chapter.

    Kepler's Third Law is true for any planetary orbit. In the case of an Earth satellite, the value of the constant is 130,958.995,396 (using the more precise value of 9.80665 for the acceleration of gravity instead of 9.81), and the law can now be rearranged to give two simple formulas:

        _________________________________________________________________________
     
        orbital_radius =  5,078 * orbital_period^(2/3)
     
        orbital_period  = ( orbital_radius / 5,078 )^1.5
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
     
    -- with the orbital period in hours and the orbital radius in kilometers.

    BACK_TO_TOP

    [3.2] SATELLITE ORBITS

  • Kepler's Third Law can be used to calculate simple satellite orbits. For
  • example, for a satellite to have a period of 2 hours, it will have an orbital radius of:
        5,078 * 2^(2/3)  =  8,060 kilometers
     
    This corresponds to an altitude of 8,030 - 6,340 = 1,690 kilometers. Similarly, at an altitude of 19,000 kilometers, or three Earth radii, the satellite has a period of:
        ((6,378 + 19,000) / 5,078 )^1.5  =  11.2 hours
     
    An orbit with a period of 24 hours has an interesting property, in that this is the same as the rotation period of the Earth, and so the satellite "hangs" over one spot on Earth. This occurs at a radius of:
        5,078 * 24^(2/3)  = 42,250 kilometers  
     
    -- or an altitude of about 35,900 kilometers. Of course, since satellites orbit around the center of mass of the Earth, such a "geosynchronous" or "geostationary" orbit has to be over the equator, or the satellite will weave north and south during its 24-hour orbit.

    Geostationary orbits are very handy for some types of satellites, such as weather observation and, particularly, communications satellites. The orbital "slots" where a satellite may be placed in geostationary orbit are regulated and are traded as a commercial commodity by satellite companies. A satellite TV user has to focus his or her home dish antenna on a satellite in a particular orbital slot and then lock the dish in place.

    By the way, the Earth's axis of rotation is at an angle to its orbit around the Sun, and so the orbits of geostationary satellites around the equator are at an angle to the Sun as well. This means that the Sun's pull tends to tug them out of position, and so they are fitted with small "station keeping" thrusters to keep them in their position. These thrusters do not need to be very powerful, since only a slight nudge is needed. Once the fuel for the thrusters is gone, the satellite will gradually drift out of its geostationary orbit and become useless.

  • Not all satellites are put into geostationary orbit, of course. 35,750
  • kilometers is a long way from Earth. Communications satellites that have to pick up signals from small ground transmitters that don't have the power to reach geostationary orbit are implemented as "constellations" of small satellites in fast low Earth orbits (LEO), with enough of the satellites in orbit to make sure one that when one goes down over the far horizon, another has come up over the near horizon to make sure communications remain constant.

    Satellites that observe the Earth in detail for military, commercial, or scientific purposes are also usually in LEO, placed into orbits over the poles, so that as they spin around the Earth once every hour or so, the Earth rotates underneath them. In 24 hours, such a satellite will be able to scan the entire Earth.

    In reality, while a purely polar orbit may be used for satellites that scan the Earth with radar, those that take pictures are not usually put into an orbit that takes them precisely over the poles. They are put into a slightly offset orbit at a specific altitude that has the interesting property of placing them over a particular location on the equator at the very same time every day in a particular time zone.

    This is known as a "Sun synchronous" orbit, and it is done to ensure that the lighting conditions are as consistent as possible between observational passes. Changing shadow lengths and positions makes comparison of images from successive passes of a satellite difficult. If the shadows are the same on each orbit, then any changes are much more noticeable.

    For example, Argentina's SAC-C scientific Earth observation satellite, launched late in 2000, was put into orbit at an altitude of 702 kilometers and an inclination of 98.2 degrees from the equator. The inclination is described as 98.2 degrees, rather than 81.8 degrees, to emphasize that the satellite has a "retrograde" orbit, that is, in the reverse direction to the Earth's rotation. SAC-C passes over the equator at 10:15 AM local time during each orbit, and probably flies over my head at northern mid-latitudes about 10:00 AM US Mountain Time every day.

  • The orbits described so far are circular, but there's also no reason that
  • they can't be elliptical, dropping down close to the Earth at one part of its orbit, and then rising very high over the Earth at another part of its orbit.

    Such an elliptical orbit demonstrates an interplay between kinetic and potential energy. At the lowest part of its orbit, the "perigee", the satellite is moving very fast. It has maximum kinetic energy and minimum potential energy. As it circles around the Earth and arcs to greater heights, it loses kinetic energy to gravitational potential energy and slows, eventually reaching a minium velocity at the very top of the ellipse, the "apogee". It now has minimum kinetic energy and maximum potential energy, in much the same way as a ball thrown upward reaches the top of its arc, floating for an instant before reversing its direction. Once the object in orbit reaches its apogee, it then falls back down along its orbit, picking up speed until it reaches the perigee again.

    This behavior leads to a neat relationship: if a radius is drawn from the spacecraft to the center of the Earth, that radius will sweep out equal areas in equal intervals of time. This is "Kepler's Second Law". If the satellite is near its apogee, that radius is very long, and as it is moving slowly in a particular interval of time the area it sweeps out is a long, narrow slice. If the satellite is near its perigee, it is moving fast, and the area it sweeps out in the same amount of time is a short, wide slice with exactly the same area.

    Elliptical orbits were particularly useful to the Soviet Union. The USSR was at a high latitude, and geosynchronous communications satellites tended to be too close to the horizon to be useful in the northern regions of the country. As a result, the Soviets launched communications satellites named "Molniyas" into elliptical orbits that took them high over the USSR, arcing overhead for long periods of time, and then falling back down around the other side of the Earth to make whip around quickly for another gradually slowing arc up over the Motherland.

    This orbit became known as a "Molniya orbit". The Americans employed Molniya orbits for spy satellites used to listen in on Soviet communications. Although the modern Russian state seems to be more interested in geostationary communications satellites, some American "eavesdropping" satellites are still launched into Molniya orbits.

  • Incidentally, while everyone knows an ellipse is a "less than perfect"
  • circle, it is formally defined as the points on a closed curve where the sum of the distances from two "focal points" within the curve to one of the points on the curve are a constant.

    A more intuitive way to see this is to imagine two pins stuck into a piece of cardboard to act as focal points, with a loop of thread laid around the threads. A pen is used to stretch the loop taut and then trace a curve all the way around the two focal points. Obviously, if both focal points are in the same place, the pen will draw out a circle, but the farther apart the pins are placed, the more elliptical the curve becomes.

    The longest distance from the edge of the ellipse to its center is called the "semi-major axis", while the shortest distance is unsurprisingly called the "semi-minor axis". The "eccentricity" is given as the ratio of the distance from the center to a focal point versus the length of the semi-major axis. This has a value of 0 for a circle, with the focal point at the center of the curve, and approaches a value of 1 as the curve becomes more elliptical.

  • The best place to launch a satellite into a geostationary orbit is from a
  • launch site near the equator, such as the European Space Agency's space center in Korou, French Guiana, on the northern coast of the South American landmass. This not only minimizes the amount of fuel needed to bring the satellite into equatorial orbit, but the high linear velocity of the Earth's rotation at the equator gives a launcher the equivalent of an extra "boost".

    After launch, a geostationary satellite is placed into a highly elliptical temporary "geostationary transfer orbit" with the apogee at 35,750 kilometers. Once the satellite reaches that altitude, it fires a rocket engine to "circularize" its orbit and not fall down to its perigee again.

    An equatorial launch site is not the best choice for a polar orbit, since the launcher's upper stage must expend fuel to turn the spacecraft's orbit towards the poles. A high-latitude space center is better for launching such spacecraft, and a small space center has been built on Kodiak Island off of Alaska to support such launches.

    The American Kennedy Space Flight Center at Cape Canaveral in Florida is between these two extremes, and so is equally useful, or equally flawed, for launching payloads into equatorial or polar orbits. In some cases, such as the early manned orbital spaceflights, the orbital plane is not particularly critical, and except for the equatorial orbital-velocity boost, there is no penalty or much advantage in using one launch site or another from the orbital dynamics point of view.

  • As this explanation of satellite orbits shows, they are carefully planned
  • and well defined. This brings up as a counterexample the memory of a novel I read decades ago where the author had a spy satellite moving around sideways and then stopping over a particular target to take pictures. Considering that I don't remember anything else about the novel, at least the author gave me a bit of unintentional humor to remember him by.

    BACK_TO_TOP

    [3.3] INTERPLANETARY SPACECRAFT TRANSFER ORBITS

  • Although the Earth's gravity well goes on forever in principle, that
  • doesn't mean it takes infinite energy for a spacecraft to leave the Earth. One of the elementary but subtle truths of mathematics is curves that go on forever actually may be summed up to a specific value. If a spacecraft is launched at a high enough velocity, called an "escape velocity", it will have enough energy to ensure that it will never be pulled back into the Earth's gravity well again. The escape velocity for Earth is 11.2 kilometers per second.

    To send a space probe to another planet, the probe has to be blasted out of the Earth's gravity well at more than the escape velocity. However, it isn't enough to just point the launch rocket at the planet and blast away. Even the largest booster rocket can only burn for times measured in a total of minutes, while the planets are so far away that a probe will take months or years to reach them.

    This means that the probe has to be launched on a trajectory that "leads" the motion of the target planet. The probe is launched out of the Earth's gravity well into an orbit around the Sun that arcs between the Earth's orbit and the target planet's orbit. This trajectory is called a "Hohmann transfer orbit", after German space pioneer Walter Hohmann, who published details of the concept in 1925.

    To reach Mars, the probe must be given additional velocity, a "delta-vee" in the jargon, relative to the Earth's orbit around the Sun so that its transfer orbit will reach outward towards Mars. Counterintuitively, to reach Venus, the probe must be given a delta-vee that reduces its velocity relative to the Earth's orbit so that the transfer orbit will fall inward towards Venus. In other words, the launch vehicle actually slows down the spacecraft, at least relative to its orbit around the Sun.

    Software is used to calculate transfer orbits. Such programs are by no means trivial to write. The problem is that there are many bodies in the Solar System, and a spaceflight engineer has to at the very minimum consider the interactions of the Earth, the target planet, and the Sun to properly calculate a transfer orbit. The gravitational interactions of three or more bodies are so complicated that they are computationally overwhelming, and to make matters worse such systems are "chaotic": Any slight change in initial conditions can quickly lead to wild variations in trajectory. This is known as the "N-body problem."

    In practice, transfer orbits are calculated using simplified methods. For example, calculating the interactions of two bodies is an exercise in simple physics. The trajectories are defined by "Kepler's First Law", which states that motions of a planet or a spacecraft around the Sun or other larger mass is always in the form of a "conic section".

    A conic section is the geometric figures that can be obtained by cutting through the side of a hollow cone and tracing out the edge of the cut. A circle is obtained by cutting through the cone at an angle perpendicular to the axis of the cone. Move the angle away from the perpendicular, the section becomes an ellipses that becomes more elongated as the angle increases, with its value of eccentricity increasing to approach 1.

    Once the angle becomes exactly that of the slope of the cone, in which case the eccentricity has a value of 1, the ellipse becomes an open figure known as a "parabola". If the angle is increased further, the open figure widens into a succession of "hyperbolas".

    In reality, the movements of celestial bodies in the Solar System are always either ellipses or hyperbolas. Circles and parabolas are "perfect" figures, corrupted by any variation in the cutting angle through the cone from the horizontal or vertical respectively, essentially teetering towards "imperfect" ellipses and hyperbolas with any change in circumstances, and so unlikely to occur in the somewhat messy real Universe.

    Orbital planning software calculates one set of conics to define the spacecraft's trajectory at launch, calculates a second set of conics for the spacecraft's trajectory at its target, and tries to find one conic in each set that match up.

  • When the probe arrives at the target planet, it will generally have so much
  • velocity that it will swing by the planet and continue on it orbit around the Sun. Traditionally, the probe has to fire its rocket engine to reduce its velocity enough to allow it to be captured by the planet's gravity. This requires a fair amount of fuel, and a more economical approach known as "aerocapture" has been considered. In this scheme, the probe is fitted with a heatshield and actually skims through the upper atmosphere of the planet, presuming it has one, to literally "burn off" the excess velocity using friction.

    This is unsurprisingly a very precise operation. Although "aerobraking" was used to circularize the orbit of the American Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) probe launched in 1996, MGS used its rocket engine to allow it to be captured by Mars' gravity in the first place. The French CNES space agency is considering launch of a Mars probe in 2005 that will be the first to use aerocapture to enter orbit around another planet.

  • Spaceflight enthusiasts have used transfer orbit calculations to come with
  • an ingenious idea known as the "cycler". This is a space station that is in a permanent transfer orbit between, say, Earth and Mars. The cycler would pass close by Earth and later pass close by Mars on a regular schedule. Astronauts would be able to hitch a ride on the cycler station to go to Mars, and later pick up the cycler again to return to Earth.

    The astronaut's trip times for an Earth-Mars cycler would be several years, but some schemes fit the cycler with a high-efficiency rocket system to adjust the trajectory, permitting trip times as low as half a year.

    BACK_TO_TOP

    [3.4] GRAVITY ASSIST TRAJECTORIES

  • A simple Hohmann transfer orbit works well enough to send a probe to Mars
  • or Venus, but sending a probe to the distant outer planets using such a trajectory would take far too much time. Space launch planners have developed an interesting and subtle way to "cheat" and greatly reduce the time and expense of such missions by sending the probe on a "slingshot" trajectory around a planet to obtain a "gravity assist".

    This is a subtle idea. If a probe is sent on a flyby around a planet, it approaches the planet from one direction, arcs around it, and departs in another direction. As viewed from the planet, the probe will not leave the planet with any greater velocity than it arrived with. The probe has the same energy before and after the encounter, even if it speeds up during the flyby. The delta-vee is zero.

    The trick is that the planet being used for the gravity assist is a moving object. If the probe swings behind the planet in its orbit, some of the velocity of the planet is transferred to the probe while the planet slows down slightly. However, since the velocity transfer between the two objects is inversely proportional to their mass, the probe's increase in velocity is substantial, while the planet's decrease in velocity is literally unmeasurable.

    A probe can be swung around in front of a planet in its orbit to decrease velocity. A gravity assist can be regarded as similar to a "soft collision", with the spacecraft "bouncing" off a planet and obtaining a delta-vee thereby.

  • The concept of a gravity assist trajectory was pioneered in the 1960s by
  • engineers at the US National Aeronautics & Space Administration's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA JPL) in California. By a stroke of good luck, their work on gravity slingshots led them to realized that beginning in the late 1970s, all four outer gas giant planets would be strung out in a perfectly staggered formation beginning in the late 1970s, a configuration that only occurred once every 175 years. The new gravity assist technique could be used to slingshot a space probe from one planet to the next.

    This "Grand Tour" trajectory was implemented on the Voyager 2 space mission, which was launched in 1977. The probe performed a flyby of Jupiter in 1979, slinging it on to a flyby of Saturn in 1981, a flyby of Uranus in 1986, and a flyby of Neptune in 1989. Voyager 2's scientific payback was unexcelled by any other single space mission.

    Gravity assist trajectories have been used on many other deep-space missions. For example, the Galileo Jupiter orbiter was faced with being drastically cut back in the mid-1980s because the powerful booster rocket originally designed for it was cancelled and it had to use a much smaller rocket instead. Fortunately, the mission was saved by coming up with a "Venus-Earth-Earth Gravity Assist (VEEGA)" trajectory in which the probe swung past Venus once and Earth twice to obtain a gravity assist on each pass.

    NASA's s "Stardust" comet sample-return mission, launched in February 1999, performed an Earth flyby in January 2001 to set it on course to pass near the comet Wild-2 in 2004, which has an orbit between Mars and Jupiter. The probe will use a glass-foam "aerogel" to obtain samples of materials in the comet's coma, and will then loop back to Earth, dropping off a capsule containing the samples that will parachute down into the Utah desert.

    BACK_TO_TOP

    [3.5] GRAVITY AND PLANETS / TIDES

  • So far, the orbital scenarios have involved a great big planet and, in
  • comparison, a very small spacecraft. The basic concepts aren't different when two planet-sized bodies are involved, but some additional rules come into play.

    The first additional rule is that one body doesn't orbit around the other, they both orbit around the center of mass of the system. A spacecraft in orbit around the Earth has so little mass that its effect on the Earth is negligible, and so the spacecraft's orbit for all practical purposes goes around the center of the Earth. However, if two planet-sized bodies of the same size orbit each other, then they both orbit around a common point halfway between each other. This point is sometimes referred to as the "barycenter".

    If they are less equal in size, the barycenter is their center of gravity. A good example of this is the distant planet Pluto and its large moon Charon, which are closer in size than any other planet and its moon in the Solar System. Charon has a mass that is 15% that of Pluto's, and the distance between the two is about 20,000 kilometers. The balance point P, as measured from the center of Pluto, can be determined with the simple equivalence:

        mass_pluto * P  =  ( 20,000 - P ) * mass_charon
     
        mass_pluto * P  +  mass_charon * P  =  20,000 * mass_charon
     
        P * ( mass_pluto + mass_charon )  =  20,000 * mass_charon
     
        P  =  20,000 * mass_charon / ( mass_pluto + mass_charon )
     
           =  20,000 * 0.15 / ( 1 + 0.15 )  =  2,610 kilometers
     
  • The second additional rule is that the two bodies have "tidal" effects on
  • each other, due to the differential effect of gravity across the diameter of a planet. The Moon and Earth have a strong tidal interaction on each other, manifested on Earth as the rise and fall of ocean coastal waters during the passage of a day.

    Although the sum of the gravitational force between the Earth and the Moon acts on a line through their centers, of course the gravitational force of each world acts on every part of the other. Since gravitational force decreases with the square of the distance, the Moon's force on the near face of the Earth is weaker than its force on the far face. This difference in force between the two faces is equivalent to a force between them that attempts to stretch the Earth into an ovoid, with its long axis pointed towards the Moon.

    As the Earth is pretty solid, the tidal effect on the land masses is slight, but the tidal strain is enough to cause the oceans to shift around on a regular cycle. While the usual tidal change is a meter or two, some coastal estuaries funnel the tides and increase their height to up to 15 meters, and hydropower dams have been built in a few such locations. When the tide goes high, the dam opens to let the seawater into the estuary, spinning a power turbine on the way in. The dam is then closed, and when the tide drops, the dam opens to let the water back out into the ocean, spinning the turbine on the way back out again.

    The Sun also contributes to tides, but the although the Sun is much more massive than the Moon and has a much greater gravitational force on the Earth, the Sun is much farther away. An analysis of tides as a differential gravitational force shows they fall off with the cube of distance between two masses, not the square as does gravity itself, so the Sun's tidal influence falls off much faster than its gravitational influence.

    Higher tides do occur when the Sun and Moon are aligned on opposite sides of the Earth, causing their tidal effects to work together. These are known as "spring tides", meaning they "spring up" above normal, not because they happen in the spring -- they can happen in any season. When the Sun and Moon are at right angles relative to the Earth, their tidal effects work against each other, and the result are low or "neap" tides.

  • One of the interesting implications of the tidal forces on the Earth is
  • that they cause precession of the Earth's spin axis. The Earth's spin axis is tilted at an angle of 23 degrees to the ecliptic, the plane of the planet's orbit around the Sun, while the Moon's orbit is in the plane of the ecliptic. The tidal forces of the Moon and Sun tug the spin axis of the Earth back towards the horizontal, but since the Earth is spinning this causes precession instead, with a period of about 26,000 years. At the present time, the Earth's spin axis points towards Polaris, the pole star, but 13,000 years from now it will point to a location near the bright star Vega.

    The effect of the Earth's tidal force on the Moon is much more dramatic and is easily seen by the fact that the Moon only presents one face to the Earth at all times. Over the eons, the Earth's tidal effect slowed the Moon's rotation until it became the same as the period of the Moon's orbit around the Earth. The Moon is said to be "tidally locked" to the Earth.

    Incidentally, the Moon's tidal forces are very gradually slowing down the Earth's rotation as well. 900 million years ago, the Earth's day was only 18 hours long. The Moon was 7.5% closer to the Earth, and the lunar month was 23.4 days. The distance between the Earth and the Moon can now be precisely measured by bouncing a laser beam off a laser reflector left on the Moon by the Apollo manned lunar expeditions. These measurements show that tidal stresses set up by the Earth on the Moon are accelerating it, and it is moving farther away from the Earth at a rate of 3.8 centimeters per year.

    BACK_TO_TOP

    [3.6] GRAVITY IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM / LIBRATION POINTS / STELLAR MASSES

  • With a few exceptions, all the moons in the Solar System are tidally locked
  • to their planets. In the Pluto-Charon system, both planets are tidally locked to each other, so Charon hangs overhead in Pluto's sky in the same place at all times. The energy of rotation of the two worlds was dissipated in internal heating due to tidal stretching effects. This tidal heating appears to be a significant process in the internal heating of Jupiter's volcanic moon Io, which is relatively close to the giant planet and so is subjected to strong tidal forces. The surface of Io is covered with huge sulfurous volcanic flows.

    It was once thought that the planet Mercury was tidally locked to the Sun, so that it kept one face eternally faced to the Sun and the other in darkness, one side burning and the other side freezing. This was found to be not exactly the case in the 1950s. It is in a "resonance" where it turns three times for every two orbits around the Sun.

    This is known as a "metastable" state. If Mercury kept one face always to the Sun, it would be in a minimum energy state, but to get out of its 2:3 resonance state, it would have receive some sort of increase in rotational energy, possibly through a collision with another large body. Until something like this happens, Mercury's rotation will remain as it is, something like a stone that been caught on a ledge after falling halfway down a cliff instead of dropping all the way to the bottom.

  • Due to the N-body problem, the gravitational interactions between all the
  • planets in the Solar System are complicated and difficult to predict over the long run. At a coarse scale, the gravitational interactions of the Solar System are dominated by the Sun, which is over 330,000 times more massive than the Earth, and Jupiter, which is about 320 times more massive than the Earth, The second biggest planet, Saturn, is only about 95 times the mass of the Earth, and all the other planets are much smaller than that. Jupiter has well more than twice the mass of all the other worlds in the Solar System combined.

    Jupiter's gravitational influence led to the creation of the asteroid belt, since it prevented the formation of any single large body at that location. Interestingly, there are empty "bands" in the asteroid belt that correspond to asteroid orbits that would have a some sort of synchronization or "resonance" with that of Jupiter. Any asteroid in such an orbit is quickly pulled out of it by repeated tugs from Jupiter.

    Another consequence of Jupiter's gravitational influence is that objects straying into the two locations in its orbit that are equally distant from the Jupiter and the Sun tend to stay there. These orbital positions are known as "libration points", or sometimes "Lagrangian points" after the 18th century French mathematician Louis Lagrange. Lagrange performed an analysis of the gravitational interactions of two bodies in orbit around each other to identify positions where objects would remain stationary relative to the bodies.

    He actually discovered five such stable positions, now known as "L1" through "L5", roughly laid out as follows relative to two masses of the same size:

    L1, L2, and L3 are only stable in the sense that an object balanced on a point is stable. L1 is located between the two bodies, and an object placed there will fall towards one or the other if disturbed. Objects at L2 and L3 are at a precise orbital radius around the two bodies where they keep pace with the orbits of the bodies. At a lower radius, the objects will have a faster orbit and move ahead, while at a higher radius, they will have a slower orbit and fall behind.

    In contrast, the equidistant positions, L4 and L5, are stable in the sense that an object caught in a hole is stable. If any object caught at these locations is disturbed and begins to move out of them, the forces of the two bodies will tend to nudge it back into place. The L4 and L5 positions in Jupiter's orbit have trapped a number of asteroids, referred to as "Trojan asteroids".

  • One effect of the interactions between the planets is to rule out the
  • existence of a "Counter Earth", a plot device found in old science-fiction stories. The idea is that there is another planet on the other side of the Sun exactly opposite to Earth that remains eternally unseen.

    This would seem implausible in the first place, since it's obvious there are no other "counter planets" such as a "Counter Mars" or "Counter Jupiter". The Earth is on the opposite side of the Sun relative to every other planet at some time or other, and no counter-worlds for Mars or Jupiter have been seen. Furthermore, a Counter Earth would be a bright object, and no deep space probe has ever spotted such a thing.

    In reality, a Counter Earth is completely impossible, since even if such a world were magically created right now, the unbalanced interactions of all the other planets on the Earth and Counter Earth would disrupt the neat balance, possibly leading to a disastrous collision between the two planets.

  • A knowledge of orbital mechanics is very useful for the studies of distant
  • star systems. The stars look like points of light in even the largest conventional telescope, and so astronomers have to rely on sometimes very subtle indirect means to determine their distance, size, and true brightness.

    This task is simplified if astronomers find a "double star" system, in which two stars orbit around each other. It is possible to precisely time how long the orbit takes through observation. It is also possible to determine how fast the stars are moving in their mutual orbit through changes in the color of their light emission, or "Doppler shift", which is discussed in a later chapter.

    If the velocity of the stars in their mutual orbit is known and the period of the orbit is known, then the length of the circumference of the orbit can be determined by multiplying the velocity times the period, giving the length of the circumference of the orbit. Comparing the actual size of the orbit against its size as seen from Earth can give a good estimate of the distance to the double-star system.

    Furthermore, knowing the size of the orbit and its period gives the combined mass of the two stars, using Kepler's Third Law:

        _________________________________________________________________________
     
        orbital_period^2  =  constant * orbital_radius^3
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
     
    The constant in this expression is related to the force of gravity between the two stars and so two masses involved, and so the expression can be algebraically manipulated to give:
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
        system_mass  =  constant * ( radius^3 ) / ( period^2 )
        _________________________________________________________________________
     
     
    The constant can be simplified by specifying the orbital radius in terms of the Earth's orbit, or "astronomical unit (AU)", the orbital period in terms the Earth's orbital period, or years, and the system mass in terms of multiples of the mass of the Sun.

    For the case of the Earth-Sun system, this gives the system mass, the radius, and the period all as 1, and so the constant has to be 1 to get the right result. Of course, for the Earth-Sun system the mass of the Earth is negligible compared to that of the Sun.

    Suppose a distant star system is discovered featuring two stars with an orbital radius of 2.3 AU and an orbital period of 1.2 years. This gives the combined mass of the two stars as:

        ( 2.3^3 ) / ( 1.2^2 ) = 8.45 solar masses
     
    BACK_TO_TOP

    [3.7] LIBRATION POINTS, HALO ORBITS, & MANIFOLDS

  • Libration points are very useful in spaceflight planning. The L4 and L5
  • locations relative to the Earth and Moon have been promoted as ideal locations for space colonies. Similarly, the Sun-Earth L1 position, a hundredth of the way from the Earth to the Sun, is an ideal location for satellites that observe the Sun, while the Sun-Earth L2 position, 1.5 million kilometers beyond the Earth's orbit around the Sun, is an ideal location for satellites used to perform deep space astronomy.

    Several solar observatories have been launched into the Sun-Earth L1 position, and in August 2001 NASA launched a spacecraft named "Genesis" that was placed there between Earth and Sun to capture particles emitted by the Sun for return to Earth. At the L1 position, these spacecraft have an excellent view of the Sun that is never blocked by the Earth, and are within easy communications range of the Earth.

    In the summer of 2001, NASA launched the "Microwave Anisotropy Probe (MAP)", which was parked in the Sun-Earth L2 position, far beyond the Moon's orbit away from the Sun. There, the spacecraft began mapping low-level energy emissions from the Universe, deploying a shield to block out emissions from the Sun and Earth that might disrupt the measurements. Other astronomical spacecraft are now being designed to take up station at the L2 position, where they will have a view of deep space that also will never be obscured by the Earth, and which will be in relatively close communications range.

  • Of course, sending several spacecraft Sun-Earth L1 or L2 position would
  • lead to clutter, and the L1 position has the added difficulty that any spacecraft sitting there is in the full glare of the Sun as seen from Earth. The Sun generates radio noise as well as light, and this makes communications with the spacecraft troublesome.

    The solution to both these problems is what is known as a "halo" orbit, in which a spacecraft performs long, lazy curved loops around the libration point, almost as if the libration point were a celestial body.

    A halo orbit is an N-body problem, involving interactions between the probe, the Sun, and the Earth. Early calculations of halo orbits involved making educated guesses, running them through a software simulation, and then using the result to get a better guess.

    This approach was workable but crude. In the 1990s, improved software was developed that essentially mapped out entire ranges of three-body trajectories, known as "manifolds". Paths known as "dynamical channels" can be identified on the manifolds that chart out the course a spacecraft would follow on its own after given an initial push, analogous to the way a ball bearing would meander about on an uneven surface after being given a nudge one way or another.

    The Genesis spacecraft, for example, was initially launched into a parking orbit around Earth. A short engine burn then sent it drifting towards the Sun, and three months later another brief burn put into a halo orbit around the L1 position. It is now performing a total of four halo orbits, each lasting six months.

    After the end of the sampling mission, another burn will put the probe on a orbit that will send it all the way back to a halo orbit around L2, where MAP will be making its measurements, and then to a close Earth flyby, where Genesis will drop its sample package. The reason for this roundabout maneuver is to allow the package to be ejected during daylight hours. As it is to be recovered by helicopter to prevent contamination, it cannot be sent back at night.

    Spaceflight engineers working with manifolds have envisioned them as very useful for probes to explore the Jupiter and Saturn systems. Both these planets have extensive sets of large moons that set up complicated manifolds. By exploiting dynamical channels along these manifolds, the probe could maneuver from moon to moon, remaining at each for as long as desired, and then changing position with a slight nudge from its rocket engine.

    BACK_TO_TOP

    [3.8] FOOTNOTE: LARRY NIVEN'S INTEGRAL TREES

  • Science-fiction writer Larry Niven wrote a pair of novels titled THE
  • INTEGRAL TREES and THE SMOKE RING that have some interesting insights into orbital mechanics. These two novels postulated a double star system, consisting of a small white dwarf star named "Voy" in orbit around a bright central star named "T3".

    Voy had a giant planet in orbit around it in turn. Voy had once been a bigger, brighter star itself, but the stellar explosion that turned it into a hot stellar cinder stripped the planet of its gaseous outer layers, resulting in a ring or "torus" of gas that stretched completely around the planet's orbit around Voy.

    This "Smoke Ring" was long-lasting and contained enough debris to support the evolution and propagation of life. Plants evolved that produced oxygen, eventually making the Smoke Ring an environment where humans could breathe and survive. When a mutiny stranded an interstellar expedition from Earth there, successive generations of humans colonized the Smoke Ring and gradually spread all the way around it.

    The major landmarks in the Smoke Ring were the "Integral Trees", which were huge free-floating trees about a hundred kilometers long that were curved into an elongated "S" shape, similar to the integral symbol used in calculus. Humans tribes colonized the tips of the Integral Trees, which were covered with jungle-like "tufts" of greenery, while the intermediate parts of the tree were generally barren.

    The orbit of an object is defined at its center of mass, which was at the center of an Integral Tree. Since the Integral Tree was an elongated object, tidal forces from the double star forced the Integral Tree to point toward Voy at the center of its orbit, crossways to the tree's motion.

    An independent object orbiting below, or "south", of the center of mass of the Integral Tree would have a faster orbit, while an independent object orbiting above, or "north", of the center of mass of the Tree would have a slower orbit. However, as the Integral Tree was a solid object, the entire Tree orbited at the same speed. This meant that the south tuft of the Tree was moving slower than independent objects in the same orbital radius, and the north tuft of the Tree was similarly moving faster than independent objects in the same orbital radius.

    At the south tuft, since the gases in the Smoke Ring were moving at their natural orbital speed but the tuft of the tree was moving more slowly, the tuft was in a perpetual howling wind blowing from behind the Tree's direction of motion. The southern end of the Tree curved in the direction of its motion to offer less resistance to this wind, while the tuft filtered debris from the wind to support the growth of the Tree.

    Gravity was no longer completely balanced by centripedal acceleration, and the result was that the humans felt a net gravitational force that grew stronger the farther south they went. Of course, they had to stay on the inside of the curve of the tuft, since if they went below they could fall off into the Smoke Ring.

    In a complementary fashion, the north tuft was moving faster than the gases at its orbital radius, and so the north tuft faced a similar howling wind but in the opposite direction, coming from in front of the Tree. As with the south tuft, it curved away from the wind and the tuft collected debris blown into it by the wind.

    Centripedal acceleration was no longer balanced by gravity, and so the humans felt a net "artificial gravity" that grew stronger the farther north on the tuft they went. Once again, they had to stay on the inside of the curve, or they would be flung off into the Smoke Ring by their excess velocity.

    The excess gravitational pull on the south tuft of course had to be balanced by the excess centripedal acceleration on the north tuft, or the Integral Tree would not have been in a stable orbit. This set up a force between the two ends of the Tree that increased as the Tree grew longer, and so limited its length. In fact, old Trees tended to break apart at the middle, with disastrous consequences for the human colonies in the tufts.

    By the way, Smoke Ring materials unsurprisingly tended to accumulate in the L4 and L5 positions defined by the ring's parent planet and Voy.

    The idea of making movies out of THE INTEGRAL TREES and THE SMOKE RING is appealing, though the special effects would be so difficult that an animated film might be the best approach, particularly since the human colonists had evolved into very tall and gangly forms in the low gravity and could not be played by any normal human actor. Unfortunately, the environment of the Smoke Ring is so alien and disorienting that most viewers would not be able to figure out what was going on, and it seems plausible that if shown on the wide screen it might cause vertigo and motion sickness.

    BACK_TO_TOP

    From Vectorsite.net.

    by Greg Goebel
    RoopleTheme